•  
  •  
 

Journal Policies and Guidelines

Contents

Philosophy of Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika

For more information, please see Aims and Scope page.

Who Can Submit?

Anyone may submit an original article to be considered for publication in provided he or she owns the copyright to the work being submitted or is authorized by the copyright owner or owners to submit the article. Authors are the initial owners of the copyrights to their works (an exception in the non-academic world to this might exist if the authors have, as a condition of employment, agreed to transfer copyright to their employer).

{ top }

General Submission Rules

Submitted articles cannot have been previously published, nor be forthcoming in an archival journal or book (print or electronic). Please note: "publication" in a working-paper series does not constitute prior publication. In addition, by submitting material to , the author is stipulating that the material is not currently under review at another journal (electronic or print) and that he or she will not submit the material to another journal (electronic or print) until the completion of the editorial decision process at . If you have concerns about the submission terms for , please contact the editors.

{ top }

Formatting Requirements

Submitted articles must use the Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika template. For details on manuscript preparation, please refer to the Author Guidelines. Although we can provide limited technical support, it is ultimately the author’s responsibility to produce a high-quality electronic version of the article in the form of a PDF (Adobe’s Portable Document Format) file, or a Microsoft Word, WordPerfect, or RTF file that can be converted to a PDF file.

It should be understood that the current state of Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) technology is such that there is no guarantee—nor can there be—that documents in PDF format will function perfectly on all possible hardware and software configurations that readers may have.

{ top }

Journal Policies

Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika adheres to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Core Practices and other international standards of publication ethics. The following policies outline how JKPM upholds integrity, transparency, and accountability in all aspects of the publication process.

{ top }

1. Allegations of Misconduct

Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika ensures that any allegations of research or publication misconduct are handled fairly, consistently, and transparently. This includes concerns related to plagiarism, data fabrication, falsification, authorship disputes, or peer review manipulation.

  • Preliminary Evaluation: The Editor-in-Chief (EIC) assesses all allegations for credibility and relevance.
  • Investigation: Credible cases follow COPE flowcharts; authors and institutions may be contacted.
  • Confidentiality: All investigations are handled confidentially to protect involved parties.
  • Outcomes: Possible actions include rejection, correction, retraction, or institutional notification.
  • Record Keeping: Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika maintains detailed records of all investigations for a minimum of five years.

{ top }

2. Authorship and Contributorship

Authorship must accurately reflect individuals’ contributions to the research and writing. Contributors who do not meet authorship criteria must be acknowledged appropriately.

  • Each author must have contributed substantially to the conception, design, analysis, or interpretation of data.
  • All authors share responsibility for the integrity of the manuscript.
  • Gift, ghost, or honorary authorship is not permitted.
  • Disputes are handled according to COPE authorship dispute guidelines.

{ top }

3. Complaints and Appeals

Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika provides a transparent process for handling complaints or appeals concerning editorial decisions, peer review conduct, or ethical concerns.

  • Complaints are first addressed by the Editor-in-Chief.
  • If unresolved, they may be escalated to the publisher or ethics committee.
  • Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika follows COPE’s flowcharts for appeals and complaint resolution.

{ top }

4. Conflicts of Interest / Competing Interests

All participants in the publication process must declare any relationships or activities that could bias their work.

  • Authors must disclose all financial or non-financial interests relevant to the submitted work.
  • Editors and reviewers must recuse themselves from handling manuscripts where a conflict exists.
  • All disclosures are published alongside the article.

{ top }

5. Data and Reproducibility

Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika promotes transparency and reproducibility in research by encouraging authors to make data available and verifiable.

  • Authors must retain all raw data and provide it upon request.
  • Datasets should be properly cited if publicly available.
  • Fabrication, falsification, or selective reporting are considered misconduct.

{ top }

6. Ethical Oversight

Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika upholds high ethical standards in research involving humans, animals, or confidential data.

  • Authors must obtain approval from relevant ethics committees before conducting research.
  • Consent and confidentiality must be maintained for human subjects.
  • Any potential ethical violations will be investigated following COPE guidance.

{ top }

7. Intellectual Property

Authors must ensure that their manuscripts do not infringe on copyright, trademarks, or any intellectual property rights of others.

  • Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika respects Creative Commons licenses and open-access policies.
  • Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika (the publisher) holds the non-exclusive copyright and publication rights of all published articles.
  • Plagiarism, including self-plagiarism, is strictly prohibited.

{ top }

8. Journal Management

Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika (JKPM) ensures that its editorial management practices are transparent, accountable, and in line with best international standards.

  • The Editorial Board composition reflects expertise and diversity.
  • Editors are trained in COPE ethical standards.
  • Regular reviews of editorial and peer review performance are conducted.

{ top }

9. Peer Review Process

Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika employs a double-blind peer review process to maintain objectivity and fairness.

  • Reviewers are selected based on subject expertise and absence of conflicts of interest.
  • Reviewers must maintain confidentiality and report any ethical concerns.
  • Editors ensure timely and constructive feedback for authors.

{ top }

10. Post-Publication Discussions and Corrections

Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika maintains the integrity of the scholarly record through transparent mechanisms for corrections, retractions, and discussions.

    • Errors identified post-publication will be corrected promptly.
    • Retractions follow COPE’s Retraction Guidelines.
    • Readers may submit post-publication comments or concerns to the editorial office.

{ top }

AI Tool Usage Policy in Article Preparation

This policy provides guidance on the responsible and transparent use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools during manuscript preparation, in line with COPE, ICMJE, and WAME ethical standards.

1. Purpose and Scope

Applies to all authors who use AI tools for writing, analysis, or image generation in preparing manuscripts submitted to Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika.

{ top }

2. Principles

      • Transparency: AI use must be disclosed clearly in the manuscript.
      • Accountability: Authors remain fully responsible for all content, including that generated with AI assistance.
      • Human Oversight: AI-generated outputs must be verified and edited by humans before submission.
      • Originality: AI use must not result in plagiarism or data manipulation.

{ top }

3. Acceptable Uses

      • Grammar and language editing.
      • Formatting or reference checking.
      • Statistical or data visualization assistance (verified by authors).
      • Idea generation or summarization for conceptual clarity.

{ top }

4. Unacceptable Uses

      • Generating full text without author verification.
      • Fabricating data, references, or images.
      • Using AI to manipulate data or peer review outcomes.
      • Listing AI tools as authors.

{ top }

5. Disclosure Requirement

Authors must include an AI disclosure statement, for example:

“Portions of this manuscript were assisted by ChatGPT (OpenAI) for language editing. The authors reviewed and verified all AI-generated content.”

If no AI tools were used, authors should declare: “The authors declare that no artificial intelligence (AI) tools were used in the preparation of this manuscript.”

{ top }

6. Screening and Enforcement

      • Manuscripts may be screened for AI-generated content.
      • Undisclosed use may result in rejection or retraction.
      • JKPM reserves the right to notify authors’ institutions in severe cases.

{ top }

7. Summary of Author Responsibilities

Category Responsibility
AI Disclosure State clearly any AI tools used and their purpose.
Authorship Only humans may be listed as authors.
Accuracy Verify and validate all AI-assisted outputs.
Originality Ensure all content is free from plagiarism.
Data Integrity Retain original data and make it available if requested.

{ top }

References: COPE (2023), Elsevier (2023), Springer Nature (2023), WAME (2023), ICMJE (2024).