•  
  •  
 

Abstract

This study is aimed at identifying whether there is any difference of science process skills between the students taught using Learning Cycle 5E and those who are taught using conventional strategy controlled with preoccupied knowledge. This study used quasi experimental method with post-test only control group design involving eight grade students selected using simple random sampling. The experimental class was taught using Learning Cycle 5E and control class was taught using conventional learning. The instruments used to measure the students’ science process skills were written test in the form of essay writing, practical test, and observation sheet of instructional activity. The result shows that the science process skills of the students taught using Learning Cycle 5E was significantly different from those who were taught using conventional way with average value of process skill 28.7 and 23.0 for those who were taught using conventional strategy.

First Page

286

Last Page

290

Share

COinS