•  
  •  
 

Abstract

This study aims to determine the differences in student geography learning outcomes taught with the group investigation model and those taught by conventional methods (discussion). This type of research is a quasi-experimental (quasi experimental). The study design used a pretest - posttest non-equivalent control group design. The data analysis used is the independent sample t-test value of the gain score with the help of the SPSS 16.0 for Windows application. The results showed that there were significant differences in geographic learning outcomes between the experimental class and the control class. The value of geography learning outcomes of students taught with group investigation models is better than the geography learning outcomes of students who are taught using conventional methods (discussion). This is because students who conduct investigations can understand geography learning material on the topic of coastal abrasion better than students who study conventionally.

First Page

456

Last Page

461

Download

Share

COinS