Perbedaan Model Problem Based Learning dan Konvensional terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa

Authors

• Devi Tri Lukitasari, Pendidikan Dasar-Universitas Negeri MalangFollow
• Sudarmiatin Sudarmiatin, Magister Manajemen Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri MalangFollow
• Muhammad Zainuddin, Keguruan Sekolah Dasar dan Prasekolah-Universitas Negeri MalangFollow

Abstract

This study aims to determine the differences in the ability to think critic of elementary school students by applying the model of Problem Based Learning (PBL) and Conventional. This type of research that is a quasi-experimental design Nonequivalent Control Group Design. Number of respondents 72 students, 36 students in grade control (conventional) and the experimental class of 36 students (PBL). Instruments used the descriptions written tests. Based on research results using the Independent Sample T-Test results obtained 0.000 <0.05. This means that there are difference significant between critical thinking skills in the classroom with the conventional model and PBL. These results are supported by the acquisition of the average yield of critical thinking skills acquisition experimental class with a mean = 14.2, while the control class to get mean = 12.4. So it could be concluded that there were significant differences of critical thinking skills class with PBL and conventional models.

First Page

1125

Last Page

1131

Recommended Citation

Lukitasari, Devi Tri; Sudarmiatin, Sudarmiatin; and Zainuddin, Muhammad (2019) "Perbedaan Model Problem Based Learning dan Konvensional terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa," Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan: Vol. 4: No. 8, Article 20.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i8.12688
Available at: https://citeus.um.ac.id/jptpp/vol4/iss8/20